Reflections
of A Society's Child
An
Auto
Socio
Biography
To
those that believe in any dynamic
of a human
race, I know
game when it is in my face, And I
know pimping when it is put in place...
Do You?
To the reader
When I first had the thought of writing a book, I felt that it would be
all
about my life and me. However, as I am finally penning my thoughts, I
believe that I am writing about being
accountable.
And if you recognize yourself or a facsimile thereof in these writings or the putting together of what is now an E-book,
Thank you for the material!
Sincerely, The Author
To the copyright conscious, if I have used any material that infringes upon any assumed or conscious right thereof, just contact "the publisher;" sharing is caring...
Introduction
And if you recognize yourself or a facsimile thereof in these writings or the putting together of what is now an E-book,
Thank you for the material!
Sincerely, The Author
To the copyright conscious, if I have used any material that infringes upon any assumed or conscious right thereof, just contact "the publisher;" sharing is caring...
"We
hold these
truths to be self-evident, that all (men) are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among (Men),
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That
whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to
alter or to abolish
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers
in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety
and Happiness."
U.S. Declaration of Independence
"...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
U.S. Declaration of Independence
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law." The alleged words of Jesus of Nazareth, New Testament-Mathew 10:34-36
"...All this was inspired by the principle which is quite true in itself that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.
Adolf Hitler, 'Mein Kampf'~ Ch. 10
"…Words must mean what we say they mean or our ability to communicate will begin to break down and the communication process will ultimately, be lost…"
Paraphrased from a conversation between father and son television characters on an episode of the television sitcom, “Girlfriends.”
U.S. Declaration of Independence
"...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
U.S. Declaration of Independence
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law." The alleged words of Jesus of Nazareth, New Testament-Mathew 10:34-36
"...All this was inspired by the principle which is quite true in itself that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.
Adolf Hitler, 'Mein Kampf'~ Ch. 10
"…Words must mean what we say they mean or our ability to communicate will begin to break down and the communication process will ultimately, be lost…"
Paraphrased from a conversation between father and son television characters on an episode of the television sitcom, “Girlfriends.”
Introduction
For
many of you
that do not know me, I believe that an opinion poll of those
that do, and of those that soon will, would result in the consensus
that I am the bulls-eye, of a
derriere. Of myself, I say that I am an experiment-gone-bad because I
consider myself an American, but I am not a
patriot,
because I am not a natural resource. I am definitely a man, and
although only now sometimes
embarrassingly true to the nature of, I am still the most sinister that
I know, because I do not know what
I will, or will not do. And I can only think of some typical situations
where I would not want to be faced
with that decision, because I already know what I will do.
However, I am not a member of the “boys club,” because I do not accept the notion of an inherited, entitled or ordained male hierarchy. Sociologically, I would be an American African, since historically ALL humankind IS from the continent now known as Africa. Contrary to politics, those born in Africa and then naturalized in the United States would sociologically be African-Americans, but I try not gang bang any more other than for the principles invoked in the Constitution of these United States.
Consequently, 'In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye', it would be propitious to be aware of the psychology of ownership, especially where land is concerned, remember the human race?
As I begin to write/put this blog! together, I am less then 2 months from having 44 years of experience in the human race. Out of the many reasons that I could give for writing/putting this book together, I believe it is because I believe I can and because I believe, I must. Many write and share that they have found God or some other divinity.
Well, 'In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye,' God, (when one truly comprehends the concept of, BY ANY NAME) cannot be lost, ONLY WE, as individuals and collectively as a species can be lost. So I am writing of finding myself... a Bastard American Fighting For Liberty, Equity & Disillusionment.
Incidentally, 'In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye', religion instigates conflict, (petty gang banging, e.g. the Cain and Abel story, most prevalent in the Western world). Or, it provides a sense of security for those whose relationship with life has been interrupted and/or disrupted, (i.e. by the concept of civilization, which is truly pimping at its finest), which is happening all over the world!
Consider if you will, first of all, religion may take an otherwise common group and make them uncommon; those that believe versus those that do not believe. Secondly, religion preys on one’s insecurities and/or fears, and most of us know, and many have experienced, what can happen when one is insecure and/or afraid in any given situation.
‘In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye,’ to believe is to empower; to acknowledge, is to give respect. And to believe or not to believe, does not make truth or a lie. Long before religion, people were connected by culture, spiritual relationship and our common relationship to life. Being so-called civilized has seduced human kind into prostituting for life’s
relationship to man.
Compare if you will, the so-called Native American culture and the Native inhabitants of any so-called un-civilized community, e.g. in Africa, note the extreme similarities?
Why are some practices in so-called un-civilized communities vilified and in so-called civilized communities, the identical or similar practice(s) can be "federally" protected?
History will reveal that since our objective to find the "holy-grail" of life, being civilized, modernized, saved, or righteous, has been code for one world order for a male hierarchy, and "man," is in conflict with his environment, do you follow?
(Bet you thought I was going to say just white man huh? Well here is another reality; so-called civilization did not begin with the so-called white man. Lol, keep reading)
Throughout human kind, there have been many "groups" or gangs in power, even matriarchs. But since his-story, the members of the human species with penises have been synonymous with ruler, lord, authority or heir to everything that life produces. Accepting this ideology has simply enabled the so-called white man to put his pimping in effect like no other.
Within sound reasoning, how could the totality of ALL information about life be contained in ANY one thing or single representation of life? Not even here, lol!
‘In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye,’ to think that we can find THE answer to life is sheer arrogance and/or stupidity. And to believe that an answer is even available suggests fear, disrespect and/or gullibility.
I would like to introduce what I call the Hitler-Effect. The Hitler-Effect is the ability to transcend or influence the rationale mechanism of the brain. You see, when Hitler is most spoken of, he is noted for his madness, which most equate with him having been crazy, not so. In reality, Hitler was rather intelligent; it was the people that listened to him that were out of their damn minds. The Hitler-Effect can especially occur when a subject is experiencing what I call the H-A-L-L Syndrome-Hungry, Afraid, Lost or Lonely, (resulting in a state of vulnerability) which can be mentally, physically or spiritually, occurring singularly or in combination to varying degree.
The very dynamics that enabled me to live my life the way I once did, and to my enlightenment, orientated me for my continuing journey. And yes, I still fantasize of my former life, but it will remain my former life because I can no longer misuse the knowledge of "good and evil."
Like most, I too have allowed interruption and disruption of my life force, but be it because of age, or because of wisdom, I no longer allow myself to succumb to a predatory existence.
In digression...whenever I would regard a subject for turn-on, (never turn-out) I would start by simply having the subject examine the definition of the conjunctive good-bye; pointing out our social misuse of the word; creating a loss of certainty of information. I would then continue to point out our learned inconsistencies with the rationale of life; which most would accept to be self-preservation. Then I would further implement and monitor my subject for the presence of my so-called influence.
The most profound reality that I believe I utilized is that the members of our species with penises, control the world by bullying and/or bullshit. We do not know where we came from, where we are going or why we are here; whether we believe it or not.
So you see, what I offered had to be accepted by choice, and could had never been forced. Truth was, and still is, the key to my success. But that became my former life because I could not continue to prostitute my emotions. Yes, I still consider myself to be a predator, because such is the dynamic of animal existence. (You have to read the story!)
Now, every living creature experiences at least one of the vulnerabilities of the H-A-L-L Syndrome at some point and can be accessed at that point via that vulnerability.
We simply learned this from our study of life. And contrary to belief, the more intelligent an animal is, the easier it is to control and/or train it.
Why do you think our resources are controlled?
Why do you think we are taught to be afraid of life?
Why do you think that every one of our sciences, save one, is a searching field?
How do you think social-intercourse became a commodity?
Any body that would follow a Hitleresque philosophy is an idiot and/or a coward. Why? Because Hitler espoused an image that he himself did not even fit! Yet, he seduced a nation to follow him, and not ONE damn individual had the sense, or the courage, to point out that he himself did not have blonde hair or blue eyes, and therefore, by his own decree, could not be of pure blood and should have been exterminated himself.
Why we in this specific society continue to accept government that does not provide for all as it should and according to the principle for which it was established, is beyond my rationale. Hell, we have representatives of the people receiving direct profit from commodities critical to the measurement of an American standard of life! e.g. the Bush's have personal interest in oil...you do the math.
Hence the title of this work; 'In A P.I.M.P.'s Eye.'
Because NOBODY has a receipt, deed or title to the world and yet, we accept entitlement to, and for it, and whatever it produces. Just as I did, and do not have a coochie and yet, I got paid from the efforts of one! (Actually several) I did not however consider myself selling so-called game; I was revealing so-called game, just as I am doing now. The difference between me then and me now, is that I have developed a snack food product, which, by donating to charitable causes, I will "whore" to combat social infirmity. My vision is a worldwide fund-raising concept to benefit any and all of humanity. Because there are many suffering with H-A-L-L Syndrome.
THERE IS NOTHING TO EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS ANYBODY HUNGRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD given this planet's production.
Unless the dynamic of "starve-a-ho’-to-feed-a-pimp” is in play, a reasoning that I never could quite comprehend.
Consider if you will, the U.S. Code outlining the compensation of the President TITLE 3 > CHAPTER 2 > § 102 states:
The President shall receive in full for his services during the term for which he shall have been elected compensation in the aggregate amount of $400,000 a year, to be paid monthly, and in addition an expense allowance of $50,000 to assist in defraying expenses relating to or resulting from the discharge of his official duties. Any unused amount of such expense allowance shall revert to the Treasury pursuant to section 1552 of title 31, United States Code. No amount of such expense allowance shall be included in the gross income of the President. He shall be entitled also to the use of the furniture and other effects belonging to the United States and kept in the Executive Residence at the White House.
A Washington newspaper reported that Congress considered a presidential pay raise because the Chief executive's salary had not increased in 30 years. The panel, urged by a group of former presidential advisers, advised to at least double the president’s annual salary to $400,000 or more. Which was to take place January 2001, the provision had been included in a $13.7 billion spending bill for the Treasury, White House and other agencies approved by a House Appropriations subcommittee.
Presidential pay raise history
September 24, 1789 - $25,000 salary
March 3, 1873-$50,000 salary
March 4, 1909 - $75,000 salary
January 19, 1949 - $100,000 salary +
$50,000 expense account
January 20, 1969 - $200,000 salary +
$50,000 expense account
Another House subcommittee hearing from top presidential aides, representatives of think tanks and private specialists in executive compensation proposed that the salary increase was justified and overdue.A Reagan former chief of staff told a House Government Reform subcommittee. "This needs to be addressed now. It is a case of simple equity." Justification for raising the president's salary was that other officials, like the chief justice, got annual cost of living increases and in a few years, they'd wind up making more than the president.
The article went on to say that if the prior $200,000 a year salary had been adjusted annually for inflation as measured by the consumer price index, it would now be $923,000. “Witnesses” even claimed that freezing the salary at $200,000 had caused "pay compression," meaning that other top federal salaries were being held down for fear of surpassing the president's. Which was creating recruiting problem because talented people could make more money in the private sector instead of in government.
CAN SOMEONE SAY WE NEED PATRIOTISM IN GOVERNMENT!
The first Congress voted to pay the first president under the Constitution $25,000 a year, however, as he was already a successful man, he didn't take the money.
I WOULD SAY THAT THAT WOULD FIT INTO THE DEFINITION OF PATRIOTISM.
The salary went up to $50,000 for Ulysses Grant's second term, making him one of the world's best-paid heads of state at the time. William Howard Taft was in office in 1909 when the figure was raised another $25,000 to $75,000.
Of course, presidents get other perks, like classy public housing. But they pay for food and drink; Thomas Jefferson left the White house in debt, having spent $10,000 just on wine.
Presidents get an airplane to travel in, and on top of their expense account they have an entertainment allowance. And the pension is good: the same as a cabinet officer's salary, just over $148,000 a year.
Do U.S. presidents need the money? Only one, aside from Washington, ever refused to accept a salary, which was John F. Kennedy.
However, I am not a member of the “boys club,” because I do not accept the notion of an inherited, entitled or ordained male hierarchy. Sociologically, I would be an American African, since historically ALL humankind IS from the continent now known as Africa. Contrary to politics, those born in Africa and then naturalized in the United States would sociologically be African-Americans, but I try not gang bang any more other than for the principles invoked in the Constitution of these United States.
Consequently, 'In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye', it would be propitious to be aware of the psychology of ownership, especially where land is concerned, remember the human race?
As I begin to write/put this blog! together, I am less then 2 months from having 44 years of experience in the human race. Out of the many reasons that I could give for writing/putting this book together, I believe it is because I believe I can and because I believe, I must. Many write and share that they have found God or some other divinity.
Well, 'In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye,' God, (when one truly comprehends the concept of, BY ANY NAME) cannot be lost, ONLY WE, as individuals and collectively as a species can be lost. So I am writing of finding myself... a Bastard American Fighting For Liberty, Equity & Disillusionment.
Incidentally, 'In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye', religion instigates conflict, (petty gang banging, e.g. the Cain and Abel story, most prevalent in the Western world). Or, it provides a sense of security for those whose relationship with life has been interrupted and/or disrupted, (i.e. by the concept of civilization, which is truly pimping at its finest), which is happening all over the world!
Consider if you will, first of all, religion may take an otherwise common group and make them uncommon; those that believe versus those that do not believe. Secondly, religion preys on one’s insecurities and/or fears, and most of us know, and many have experienced, what can happen when one is insecure and/or afraid in any given situation.
‘In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye,’ to believe is to empower; to acknowledge, is to give respect. And to believe or not to believe, does not make truth or a lie. Long before religion, people were connected by culture, spiritual relationship and our common relationship to life. Being so-called civilized has seduced human kind into prostituting for life’s
relationship to man.
Compare if you will, the so-called Native American culture and the Native inhabitants of any so-called un-civilized community, e.g. in Africa, note the extreme similarities?
Why are some practices in so-called un-civilized communities vilified and in so-called civilized communities, the identical or similar practice(s) can be "federally" protected?
History will reveal that since our objective to find the "holy-grail" of life, being civilized, modernized, saved, or righteous, has been code for one world order for a male hierarchy, and "man," is in conflict with his environment, do you follow?
(Bet you thought I was going to say just white man huh? Well here is another reality; so-called civilization did not begin with the so-called white man. Lol, keep reading)
Throughout human kind, there have been many "groups" or gangs in power, even matriarchs. But since his-story, the members of the human species with penises have been synonymous with ruler, lord, authority or heir to everything that life produces. Accepting this ideology has simply enabled the so-called white man to put his pimping in effect like no other.
Within sound reasoning, how could the totality of ALL information about life be contained in ANY one thing or single representation of life? Not even here, lol!
‘In A P.I.M.P.’s Eye,’ to think that we can find THE answer to life is sheer arrogance and/or stupidity. And to believe that an answer is even available suggests fear, disrespect and/or gullibility.
I would like to introduce what I call the Hitler-Effect. The Hitler-Effect is the ability to transcend or influence the rationale mechanism of the brain. You see, when Hitler is most spoken of, he is noted for his madness, which most equate with him having been crazy, not so. In reality, Hitler was rather intelligent; it was the people that listened to him that were out of their damn minds. The Hitler-Effect can especially occur when a subject is experiencing what I call the H-A-L-L Syndrome-Hungry, Afraid, Lost or Lonely, (resulting in a state of vulnerability) which can be mentally, physically or spiritually, occurring singularly or in combination to varying degree.
The very dynamics that enabled me to live my life the way I once did, and to my enlightenment, orientated me for my continuing journey. And yes, I still fantasize of my former life, but it will remain my former life because I can no longer misuse the knowledge of "good and evil."
Like most, I too have allowed interruption and disruption of my life force, but be it because of age, or because of wisdom, I no longer allow myself to succumb to a predatory existence.
In digression...whenever I would regard a subject for turn-on, (never turn-out) I would start by simply having the subject examine the definition of the conjunctive good-bye; pointing out our social misuse of the word; creating a loss of certainty of information. I would then continue to point out our learned inconsistencies with the rationale of life; which most would accept to be self-preservation. Then I would further implement and monitor my subject for the presence of my so-called influence.
The most profound reality that I believe I utilized is that the members of our species with penises, control the world by bullying and/or bullshit. We do not know where we came from, where we are going or why we are here; whether we believe it or not.
So you see, what I offered had to be accepted by choice, and could had never been forced. Truth was, and still is, the key to my success. But that became my former life because I could not continue to prostitute my emotions. Yes, I still consider myself to be a predator, because such is the dynamic of animal existence. (You have to read the story!)
Now, every living creature experiences at least one of the vulnerabilities of the H-A-L-L Syndrome at some point and can be accessed at that point via that vulnerability.
We simply learned this from our study of life. And contrary to belief, the more intelligent an animal is, the easier it is to control and/or train it.
Why do you think our resources are controlled?
Why do you think we are taught to be afraid of life?
Why do you think that every one of our sciences, save one, is a searching field?
How do you think social-intercourse became a commodity?
Any body that would follow a Hitleresque philosophy is an idiot and/or a coward. Why? Because Hitler espoused an image that he himself did not even fit! Yet, he seduced a nation to follow him, and not ONE damn individual had the sense, or the courage, to point out that he himself did not have blonde hair or blue eyes, and therefore, by his own decree, could not be of pure blood and should have been exterminated himself.
Why we in this specific society continue to accept government that does not provide for all as it should and according to the principle for which it was established, is beyond my rationale. Hell, we have representatives of the people receiving direct profit from commodities critical to the measurement of an American standard of life! e.g. the Bush's have personal interest in oil...you do the math.
Hence the title of this work; 'In A P.I.M.P.'s Eye.'
Because NOBODY has a receipt, deed or title to the world and yet, we accept entitlement to, and for it, and whatever it produces. Just as I did, and do not have a coochie and yet, I got paid from the efforts of one! (Actually several) I did not however consider myself selling so-called game; I was revealing so-called game, just as I am doing now. The difference between me then and me now, is that I have developed a snack food product, which, by donating to charitable causes, I will "whore" to combat social infirmity. My vision is a worldwide fund-raising concept to benefit any and all of humanity. Because there are many suffering with H-A-L-L Syndrome.
THERE IS NOTHING TO EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS ANYBODY HUNGRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD given this planet's production.
Unless the dynamic of "starve-a-ho’-to-feed-a-pimp” is in play, a reasoning that I never could quite comprehend.
Consider if you will, the U.S. Code outlining the compensation of the President TITLE 3 > CHAPTER 2 > § 102 states:
The President shall receive in full for his services during the term for which he shall have been elected compensation in the aggregate amount of $400,000 a year, to be paid monthly, and in addition an expense allowance of $50,000 to assist in defraying expenses relating to or resulting from the discharge of his official duties. Any unused amount of such expense allowance shall revert to the Treasury pursuant to section 1552 of title 31, United States Code. No amount of such expense allowance shall be included in the gross income of the President. He shall be entitled also to the use of the furniture and other effects belonging to the United States and kept in the Executive Residence at the White House.
A Washington newspaper reported that Congress considered a presidential pay raise because the Chief executive's salary had not increased in 30 years. The panel, urged by a group of former presidential advisers, advised to at least double the president’s annual salary to $400,000 or more. Which was to take place January 2001, the provision had been included in a $13.7 billion spending bill for the Treasury, White House and other agencies approved by a House Appropriations subcommittee.
Presidential pay raise history
September 24, 1789 - $25,000 salary
March 3, 1873-$50,000 salary
March 4, 1909 - $75,000 salary
January 19, 1949 - $100,000 salary +
$50,000 expense account
January 20, 1969 - $200,000 salary +
$50,000 expense account
Another House subcommittee hearing from top presidential aides, representatives of think tanks and private specialists in executive compensation proposed that the salary increase was justified and overdue.A Reagan former chief of staff told a House Government Reform subcommittee. "This needs to be addressed now. It is a case of simple equity." Justification for raising the president's salary was that other officials, like the chief justice, got annual cost of living increases and in a few years, they'd wind up making more than the president.
The article went on to say that if the prior $200,000 a year salary had been adjusted annually for inflation as measured by the consumer price index, it would now be $923,000. “Witnesses” even claimed that freezing the salary at $200,000 had caused "pay compression," meaning that other top federal salaries were being held down for fear of surpassing the president's. Which was creating recruiting problem because talented people could make more money in the private sector instead of in government.
CAN SOMEONE SAY WE NEED PATRIOTISM IN GOVERNMENT!
The first Congress voted to pay the first president under the Constitution $25,000 a year, however, as he was already a successful man, he didn't take the money.
I WOULD SAY THAT THAT WOULD FIT INTO THE DEFINITION OF PATRIOTISM.
The salary went up to $50,000 for Ulysses Grant's second term, making him one of the world's best-paid heads of state at the time. William Howard Taft was in office in 1909 when the figure was raised another $25,000 to $75,000.
Of course, presidents get other perks, like classy public housing. But they pay for food and drink; Thomas Jefferson left the White house in debt, having spent $10,000 just on wine.
Presidents get an airplane to travel in, and on top of their expense account they have an entertainment allowance. And the pension is good: the same as a cabinet officer's salary, just over $148,000 a year.
Do U.S. presidents need the money? Only one, aside from Washington, ever refused to accept a salary, which was John F. Kennedy.
I. A.
P. E.